small circle 🕊 in calmness<p><a href="https://social.coop/tags/ThoughtProvoker" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ThoughtProvoker</span></a> 🤔</p><p>A <a href="https://social.coop/tags/philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>philosophy</span></a> byte: Is having a <a href="https://social.coop/tags/CommonsIdeology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CommonsIdeology</span></a>, an <a href="https://social.coop/tags/ideology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ideology</span></a> that is shared and binding force for an open <a href="https://social.coop/tags/commons" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>commons</span></a>, a case where ideology as <a href="https://social.coop/tags/concept" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>concept</span></a> is fine and unproblematic when reasoning <a href="https://social.coop/tags/society" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>society</span></a>-scale and solve its wicked problems?</p><p>Or is ideology as concept by definition flawed for any real practice use, since it can never account for the intricacy of the complex <a href="https://social.coop/tags/SocialDynamics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SocialDynamics</span></a> that are at play. A simplification, <a href="https://social.coop/tags/coping" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>coping</span></a> mechanism for <a href="https://social.coop/tags/people" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>people</span></a> to think order to chaos.</p>