karelhavlicek 🇪🇺<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://fediscience.org/@martinvermeer" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>martinvermeer</span></a></span> I must admit I haven't read the study. I am in the middle of viewing the recording of the in-person launch of the report: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPBUjcncQ40" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">youtube.com/watch?v=gPBUjcncQ4</span><span class="invisible">0</span></a></p><p>Vietnam. From what I hear from <a href="https://c.im/tags/PhillipsPOBrien" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PhillipsPOBrien</span></a> and <a href="https://c.im/tags/EliotACohen" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>EliotACohen</span></a> - my experts 🙂 - it seems to me there was not that major analytical blunder before the war. Something like all experts agreeing that the war with Vietnam will be won in three days. I don't know 🤷</p>