Kevin Karhan :verified:<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.treehouse.systems/@valpackett" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>valpackett</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://chaos.social/@jacqueline" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>jacqueline</span></a></span> then I guess your sample size is N ≤200, thus too small to be considered scientifically accurate.</p><ul><li>And even if <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/RAM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>RAM</span></a> did not fail over time, this ain't a <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Smartphone" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Smartphone</span></a> or super-small <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SBC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SBC</span></a> where one could reasonably claim <em>"we could not fit <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/socketed" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>socketed</span></a> RAM on!"</em></li></ul><p>All it is is <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/AntiRepairDesign" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AntiRepairDesign</span></a> that'll shaft buyers like on <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Apple" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Apple</span></a>'s devices...</p><p><a href="https://infosec.space/@kkarhan/114096004768883519" translate="no" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">infosec.space/@kkarhan/1140960</span><span class="invisible">04768883519</span></a></p>