Network is reliable<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.online/@mullvadnet" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>mullvadnet</span></a></span> I don't like it at all, to be honest. </p><p>Right now I can setup <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/OpenWrt" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenWrt</span></a> using your <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/XTLS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>XTLS</span></a> bridges and <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/OpenVPN" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenVPN</span></a>. And that's probably most advanced bypass setup.</p><p>But for <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/WireGuard" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>WireGuard</span></a> you do not provide something comparable to this in terms of switchover/failover, easy setup, censorship bypass.<br>I can not use your custom mix of <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Shadowsocks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Shadowsocks</span></a> and <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/WireGuard" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>WireGuard</span></a> on my OpenWrt router. And Shadowsocks is much worse than <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/xtlsreality" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>xtlsreality</span></a> </p><p>I will probably switch to a different VPN provider.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/mullvad" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>mullvad</span></a></p>