Our #APC analysis preprint was cited in a Wall Street Journal story today, along with Elsevier's response.
https://www.wsj.com/business/media/scientific-journals-quality-publishers-6399fc95?st=NQ8a7Z
Our #APC analysis preprint was cited in a Wall Street Journal story today, along with Elsevier's response.
https://www.wsj.com/business/media/scientific-journals-quality-publishers-6399fc95?st=NQ8a7Z
Since #PHP's #APC seems to be discontinued? Are folks using the #PECL http://pecl.php.net/package/APCu for #performance?
Ugh. Stupid APC UPS with it's proprietary network card and screwball console interface. I bought a secondhand network card for my UPSes, and one of them has a non-default password set.
The password reset procedure is a pain in the ass, and involved a cursed console cable.
Évaluations HCERES : la pensée tableur en action pour imposer l’approche par compétences dans les formations ?
Via le SNESup-FSU Université de Lille
https://fsu.univ-lille.fr/spip.php?article301
The editorial board of the 52-yr old _Journal of Human Evolution_ just resigned to protest #Elsevier's interference with editorial practices, reducing journal quality, and insistence on a high #APC ($3990), reducing its affordability to authors in the field. "We all care deeply about the journal, our discipline, and our academic community; however, we find we can no longer work with Elsevier in good conscience."
https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Social-Media-Statement-re-JHE-Resignations.pdf
There's no sign yet that the editors will launch a new #OpenAccess journal somewhere else. So I've not yet added it to the #OAD list of journal #DeclarationsOfIndependence
https://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Journal_declarations_of_independence
I just got two pieces of spam in one week from _Medical Sciences_, an #MDPI journal. The first invited me to submit an article and offered me a discount on its #APC. The second nagged me for not responding the first.
I'm not a medical researcher. My fields are philosophy, law, and open access. This is easy to discover in a simple web search.
If this medical journal knows my fields, then why is it soliciting an article from me? If it doesn't know my fields, then why is it soliciting an article from me?
Does it realize that its emails prove that it's spamming researchers at random without knowing the first thing about them?
I'm sure you get this kind of spam too. When you find time, I urge you to post about it and name names.
I don't do this often enough. Here are two earlier examples.
--July 2017
https://web.archive.org/web/20180801143629/https://plus.google.com/+PeterSuber/posts/CcyhJ7NudEh
--June 2018
https://web.archive.org/web/20180801143627/https://plus.google.com/+PeterSuber/posts/6DfDZABMNSv
"The World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) has served as a pivotal platform for fostering cooperation among governments, civil society, the private sector and technical communities to collectively address the opportunities and challenges brought about by the digital age. The UN Global Digital Compact (GDC) has expanded the scope of the global digital governance agenda beyond the internet-related public policy issues outlined in the WSIS consensus. It has put the spotlight on global inequality, also calling attention to the concentration of market power, the challenges posed by emerging technologies, in particular artificial intelligence (AI), and the need for renewed and more effective cooperation.
The process of deliberation in the UN system through the recently adopted Global Digital Compact in September 2024 and the upcoming 20-year review of the WSIS Agenda (WSIS+20) in 2025 are more than routine milestones in the multilateral process and the global digital cooperation ecosystem. They signify major opportunities to examine the adequacy of our actions and regroup to meet the trajectories of digital injustice headlong. They also are a flashpoint within which to situate, develop and push forward a renewed vision of digitality.
In that context, APC will engage with the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) 2024 with the intention to both contribute to those conversations and to create spaces for exchange of perspectives and identification of priorities for the WSIS+20 review, including the renewal and expansion of the mandate of the IGF itself."
#CfP on #Openresearchinformation for Scientometrics, edited by Erjia Yan and @rhaunschild:
At the Paris Conference / @BarcelonaDORI we discussed the idea of such a CfP, now we have it.
I would have preferred to see this in an #OA / #DiamondOA journal. A lot of authors relevant to this field will not be able to afford the #APC. Anyway, the CfP touches a lot of relevant and current discussions and research questions. Good to see ORI moving forward, we need evidence.
@secretbatcave @neil
Oh, that's ridiculous. Nothing is built to last nowadays.
Last time a PSU battery failed, the manufacturer told me it wasn't replaceable and I'd have to buy a whole new PSU. The battery was replaceable, at low cost, even by someone whose DIY skills are lamentable. I'm expecting the same to happen this time.
Name and shame: it was #APC, now #SchneiderElectric. I won't be buying from them again.
The @aaas slams #APCs in its comments on the draft #NIH #OpenAccess policy:
https://www.aaas.org/news/aaas-applauds-nih-draft-public-access-policy-equity-focus-and-urges-revisions-business-model
"Some #OpenAccess business models create new hurdles for authors & freeze in place existing inequities. While none of the existing business models is perfect, [#APC-based] gold open access is far less equitable to scientists. Gold open access leads to significant financial & professional impacts depending on one’s institution, discipline, career stage, geography or gender."
Introducing OSPIT, a sustainable energy and irrigation solution designed for community networks.
Catch the full coverage by the Association for Progressive Communications and see how innovation is driving change. #SustainableEnergy #OpenSource #Innovation #CommunityPower #APC #ElektraWagenrad #OSPIT
https://fed.dyne.org/post/228364
Mind over model: Allen School's Rajesh Rao proposes brain-inspired AI architecture to make complex problems simpler to solve https://news.cs.washington.edu/2024/08/19/mind-over-model-allen-schools-rajesh-rao-proposes-brain-inspired-ai-architecture-to-make-complex-problems-simpler-to-solve/ On active predictive coding (#APC).
A sensory–motor theory of the neocortex https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-024-01673-9
Update. Here's a letter to the editor of #Nature asking how to make an article #OpenAccess when one can't afford an #APC. Nature responds with ways to raise money or request waivers. It never mentions #DiamondOA or #GreenOA.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02849-w
Update. Here's another unrefereed editorial on #OpenAccess. Even after acknowledging the existence of no-fee OA journals (#DiamondOA) and no-fee #GreenOA, it asserts this howler: "OA also has certain disadvantages. First, OA is a paid service, and not all authors can face publication expenses, namely the #APC."
https://insightsimaging.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13244-024-01794-6
Update. Here's a letter from a reader upset that the Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons is converting to #APC-based #OpenAccess. He doesn't like APCs and I don't blame him. But while criticizing the journal for adopting that model, he also criticizes OA journals as such, making the false assumption that all or even most of them use APCs.
https://publishing.rcseng.ac.uk/doi/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0055
New preprint is out! We combine our recent open dataset of #APC prices with the publication counts per journal-year from @OpenAlex to estimate how much the academic community has paid in APCs over the last five years.
A: $8.349 billion ($8.968 billion in 2023 US dollars) spent on APCs.
$2.5B in 2023 alone.
We also find that median APCs *paid* are higher than median *listed* fees for both gold (paid: $2,450 vs listed: $2,000) and hybrid ($3,600 vs $3,230).
"#HarvardLibrary is launching…the Harvard Open Journals Program (#HOJP), which will…provide publishing services, resources, and seed funding to participating Harvard researchers for new academic #journals. All journal articles will be entirely free for authors and readers…The program is a direct response to faculty interest in alternatives to the article-processing-charge [#APC] model."
https://library.harvard.edu/about/news/2024-04-23/harvard-library-launching-harvard-open-journals-program
New study: #APC-based #OpenAccess journal articles enjoy a citation advantage over #paywalled articles. But so do articles in no-fee OA #repositories.
https://www.lib.auburn.edu/whatsnew/2024/03/au-librarians-and-biologists-team-up-and-use-big-data-to-investigate-open-access-publishing-models/
PS: Save your money *and* reduce our reliance on APC-based revenue models.
For #Elsevier / #RELX and other massive industrial publishers, increase in paper volume in #APC-driven open access is the main source of growth that is presented to investors. More papers needed to stay afloat in always-increasing proprietary bibliometric sea, bigger profits. On the other end of the business, surveillance backed analytics tools to insurance companies and law enforcement is the biggest growth driver.
These are the companies we have paid billions in public money to over a generation. Another 13% hike in profits, now £3 billion annually. When will we find the courage to say enough is enough?
Update. Here's another article that repeatedly refers to "OA publishing" when it means "#APC-based OA publishing". The trend it documents does not arise from no-APC OA (#DiamondOA) publishing.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-023-04876-2
"OA publishing allows publishers to generate revenue during the production process…Large commercial publishing houses have gained increasing control over the OA publishing market, which is moving towards an oligopoly market."