"Hugo de Camps Mora: One of your main arguments is that, if this particular group has managed to reach our times given the existing disdain toward them, it is because they have been expected and sometimes even been forced to act in very particular ways. How have the rich been expected to behave in order to achieve some level of legitimacy?
Guido Alfani: So as I have just explained, this increase in the degree of disdain toward the rich happens very clearly by the end of the Middle Ages. The point is that these commoners continued to grow richer and richer, and nobody could stop them. Then society was forced to adapt to this reality: by the fifteenth century, it wasn’t possible anymore to simply say, “okay, all the rich are sinners.” They were there, and they were a part of society.
That’s when you start finding a reflection on how they can help society as a whole. And a very effective way of putting this is that used by Poggio Bracciolini, an Italian humanist who in the early fifteenth century writes a treatise on avarice. He basically says that the rich in a city are like a private barn of money. And they function in a way similar to the public granaries that are set up to face the threat of famine. His point is that, if you have a crisis and you need help — and in particular financial resources, because, for example, you need to pay for war and defense — you are not going to ask the poor for help, because they will not have anything to give you.
Instead, you can ask the rich, because their private resources can be used for public benefit. And you can ask them, kindly, “Can you please lend us some money?” And if they don’t, you can, less kindly, force them to lend money or tax them, or you can even expropriate them to some degree. Across the early modern period, we find that these forced loans were quite ubiquitous in pretty much all the states of Europe in times of need."
https://jacobin.com/2025/01/wealth-aristotle-middle-ages-philosophy/